EBSA
Notices
Grant of Individual Exemptions; The FHP International Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan; and The FHP International Corporation PAYSOP (Together, the Plans) et al.
[ 11/6/2001]
[ PDF]
[Federal Register: November 6, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 215)]
[Notices]
[Page 56133-56137]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06no01-100]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2001-43; [Exemption Application No.
D-10916 and D-10917, et al.]
Grant of Individual Exemptions; The FHP International Corporation
401(k) Savings Plan; and The FHP International Corporation PAYSOP
(Together, the Plans) et al.
AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of Individual Exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction
restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
Notices were published in the Federal Register of the pendency
before the Department of proposals to grant such exemptions. The
notices set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in
each application for exemption and referred interested persons to the
respective applications for a complete statement of the facts and
representations. The applications have been available for public
inspection at the Department in Washington, D.C. The notices also
invited interested persons to submit comments on the requested
exemptions to the Department. In addition the notices stated that any
interested person might submit a written request that a public hearing
be held (where appropriate). The applicants have represented that they
have complied with the requirements of the notification to interested
persons. No public comments and no requests for a hearing, unless
otherwise stated, were received by the Department.
The notices of proposed exemption were issued and the exemptions
are being granted solely by the Department because, effective December
31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C.
App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary of
Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes the following findings:
(a) The exemptions are administratively feasible;
(b) They are in the interests of the plans and their participants
and beneficiaries; and
(c) They are protective of the rights of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plans.
The FHP International Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan; and The FHP
International Corporation PAYSOP (together, the Plans)
Located in Santa Ana, California
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2001-43; Exemption Application
Nos. D-10916 and D-10917]
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a), 406 (b)(1) and (b)(2) and
407(a) of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of
section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through
(E) of the Code, shall not apply, from April 21, 1997 through May 20,
1997, to: (1) The past receipt by the Plans of certain rights (the
Talbert Rights) to purchase shares of common stock, par value $.01 per
share, of Talbert Medical Management Holding Corporation (Talbert); (2)
the past holding of the Talbert rights by the Plans; and (3) the
disposition or exercise of the Talbert Rights by the Plans; provided
that the following conditions are satisfied:
(A) The Plans' acquisition and holding of the Talbert Rights
resulted from independent acts of FHP International Corporation (FHP)
and Talbert as corporate entities, and all holders of common stock of
FHP (FHP Common Stock) were treated in a like manner, including the
Plans;
(B) With respect to Talbert Rights allocated to the Plans, the
Talbert Rights were acquired solely for the accounts of participants
who had directed investment of all or a portion of their account
balances in FHP Common Stock pursuant to Plan provisions for
individually-directed investment of participant accounts; and
(C) With respect to Talbert Rights allocated to the Plan, all
decisions regarding the holding, disposition or exercise of the Talbert
Rights were made, in accordance with Plan provisions for individually-
directed investment of participant accounts, by the individual Plan
participants whose accounts in the Plans received Talbert Rights,
including all determinations regarding the exercise or sale of the
Talbert Rights, except for those participants who failed to file timely
and valid instructions concerning the exercise of the Talbert Rights
(in which event the Talbert Rights were sold).
EFFECTIVE DATE: This exemption is effective from April 21, 1997 through
May 20, 1997.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to
the notice of proposed exemption published on September 7, 2001 at 66
FR 46840.
Written Comments and Hearing Requests: The Department received one
letter from a commentator which did not address any issues relating to
the proposed exemption, but sought more information concerning the
transaction. The Department provided the additional information to the
person via telephone. In addition, the Department received a number of
telephone calls from other Plan participants requesting further
information. Each of these inquiries was responded to by telephone and
no additional questions were raised. The Department received no
requests for a hearing with respect to the proposed exemption.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary H. Lefkowitz of the Department,
Telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. (Anthem)
Located in Indianapolis, IN
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2001-44; Exemption Application No.
D-10979]
Exemption
Section I. Covered Transactions
The restrictions of section 406(a) of the Act and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (D) of the Code, shall not apply,
effective October 24, 2001, to the receipt, by an employee benefit plan
(the Plan) or by a Plan participant (the Plan Participant) that is an
eligible
[[Page 56134]]
member (the Eligible Member), by reason of the ownership of an
insurance policy or contract issued by Anthem, of common stock (Common
Stock) issued by Anthem, Inc. (the Parent Company), a newly-formed
holding company or cash (Cash), in exchange for such Plan's or Plan
Participant's mutual membership interest in Anthem, in accordance with
a plan of conversion (the Plan of Conversion) adopted by Anthem and
implemented under Indiana law.
This exemption is subject to the following conditions set forth
below in Section II.
Section II. General Conditions
(a) The Plan of Conversion is subject to approval, review and
supervision by the Commissioner of Insurance of the Indiana Department
of Insurance (the Commissioner) and is implemented in accordance with
procedural and substantive safeguards imposed under Indiana law.
(b) The Commissioner reviews the terms and options that are
provided to Eligible Members as part of such Commissioner's review of
the Plan of Conversion, and the Commissioner approves the Plan of
Conversion following a determination that such Plan is fair, reasonable
and equitable to Eligible Members.
(c) Each Eligible Member has an opportunity to vote to approve the
Plan of Conversion after full written disclosure is given to the
Eligible Member by Anthem.
(d) Any determination to receive Common Stock or Cash by an
Eligible Member which is a Plan, pursuant to the terms of the Plan of
Conversion, is made by one or more Plan fiduciaries which are
independent of Anthem and its affiliates and neither Anthem nor any of
its affiliates exercises any discretion or provides ``investment
advice'' within the meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3-21(c), with respect to
such decisions.
(e) Any determination to receive Common Stock or Cash by an
Eligible Member which is a Plan Participant, pursuant to the terms of
the Plan of Conversion, is made by such participant and neither Anthem
nor any of its affiliates exercises any discretion or provides
``investment advice'' within the meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3-21(c), with
respect to such decisions.
(f) After each Eligible Member entitled to receive shares of Common
Stock is allocated at least 21 shares, additional consideration may be
allocated to Eligible Members based on actuarial formulas that take
into account each Eligible Member's contribution to Anthem's statutory
surplus, which formulas are subject to review and approval by the
Commissioner.
(g) All Eligible Members that are Plans or Plan Participants
participate in the transactions on the same basis and within their
class groupings as all Eligible Members that are not Plans or Plan
Participants.
(h) No Eligible Member pays any brokerage commissions or fees in
connection with their receipt of Common Stock or in connection with the
implementation of the commission-free purchase and sale program.
(i) All of Anthem's policyholder obligations remain force and are
not affected by the Plan of Conversion.
Section III. Definitions.
For purposes of this exemption,
(a) The term ``Anthem'' means Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.
(b) An ``affiliate'' of Anthem includes--
(1) Any person directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with Anthem; (For purposes of this paragraph, the term ``control''
means the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management
or policies of a person other than an individual.) and
(2) Any officer, director or partner in such person.
(c) A ``policy'' is defined as (1) Any individual insurance policy
or health care benefits contract that has been issued by Anthem and
under which the holder thereof has membership interests in Anthem; (2)
any certificate issued by Anthem under a group insurance policy or
health care benefits contract under which certificate the holder
thereof has membership interests in Anthem; or (3) certificates of
membership issued by Anthem in or under guaranty policies under which
certificate the holder thereof is a member of Anthem with membership
interests.
(d) The term ``membership interests'' means (1) voting rights of
Anthem's members as provided by law and Anthem's Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws, and (2) the rights of members to receive
cash, stock, or other consideration in the event of conversion to a
stock insurance company under Indiana Demutualization Law or a
dissolution of Anthem as provided by Indiana insurance law and Anthem;s
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.
(e) The term ``Eligible Member'' or ``Eligible Statutory Member''
means a person or entity (1) whose name appears on Anthem's records as
the holder of one or more in force policies issued by Anthem as of both
and the date the Board of Directors adopts the Plan of Conversion and
the effective date of the Plan of Conversion, and (2) who has had
continuous health care benefits coverage with the same insuring company
during the period between those two dates under any policy without a
break of more than one day.
(f) The term ``Parent Company'' refers to a corporation organized
and existing under the Indiana Business Corporation Law. Prior to the
conversion, the Parent Company will be a wholly owned subsidiary of
Anthem. Upon the conversion of Anthem to a stock company, the Parent
Company will serve as the ``Indiana parent corporation'' of Anthem for
purposes of Indiana law. Upon the effective date of the Plan of
Conversion, the Parent Company will complete an initial public offering
(the IPO) of shares of Parent Company Common Stock for cash.
Effective Date: This exemption is effective as of October 24, 2001.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department;s decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption published on August 3, 2001 at 66 FR
40743.
Written Comments
The Department received two written comments with respect to the
proposed exemption. The first comment, which was submitted on behalf of
the UFCW Unions and Employers Health and Welfare Plan of Central Ohio,
a Plan policyholder of Anthem, by legal representatives for the Plan's
board of trustees (the Trustees), requests that the Department revise
the final exemption and require that Anthem distribute the
demutualization proceeds solely to the Plan, instead of to Plan
Participants. Due to the substantive nature of the issue presented, the
comment was forwarded to Anthem for response. The second comment, which
was submitted by Anthem, clarifies and updates the proposed exemption
in a number of areas.
Following is a discussion of the comments received, including the
responses made by Anthem and/or the Department.
Plan Policyholder Comment
As noted above, the commenter states that it represents the
Trustees of a multiemployer health and welfare plan which is funded
exclusively through employer contributions. The Plan has offered
participants the choice of either a self-insured option or a fully-
insured option through an Anthem affiliate.
The commenter notes that Anthem's Plan of Conversion generally
proposes to distribute the demutualization
[[Page 56135]]
consideration to individual certificate holders as opposed to group
policyholders. The commenter asserts that group policyholders which
contracted with certain companies prior to their merger with Anthem are
deemed entitled to the proceeds of the demutualization. However, due to
the timing of the Plan's contracting with the Anthem affiliate, the
commenter explains that Anthem intends to distribute the
demutualization proceeds to Plan Participants and not to the Plan.
This, according to the commenter, creates an inequitable result because
the premiums are paid entirely out of the Plan's assets and only those
Plan Participants who have selected the fully insured option will be
entitled to receive the proceeds from the demutualization.
In addition, the commenter indicates that the Trustees believe that
the proceeds of the demutualization should be distributed to the Plan
to be held in trust and utilized for the benefit of all Plan
Participants and beneficiaries because it would be consistent with the
Department's position on whether a Plan policyholder is entitled to
keep the proceeds of a demutualization. Assuming the proceeds are
``plan assets,'' the commenter questions on what basis Anthem can
distribute the proceeds to any party but the Plan.
Finally, the commenter notes that neither Anthem's Plan of
Conversion nor the proposed exemption appear to contemplate the Plan as
a policyholder but instead focus on the terms ``employer'' or
``association'' when describing a group policyholder or a plan sponsor.
The unique nature of the Plan, according to the commenter, justifies
different policyholder treatment and distribution of demutualization
consideration to the Plan as opposed to a limited percentage of Plan
Participants. Therefore, the commenter requests that the Department
revise the final exemption and require Anthem to distribute the
demutualization consideration to the Plan.
In response to the commenter, Anthem states that it is an Indiana-
domiciled mutual insurance company owned by its Statutory Members,
which are certain Anthem customers who have both voting and other
ownership rights in the insurer. As an Indiana-domiciled mutual
company, Anthem explains that Indiana Demutualization Law exclusively
governs its conversion to a stock company and requires the fair market
value its conversion to a stock company and requires the fair market
value of the company to be paid to Eligible Statutory Members upon the
demutualizaiton.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under its Plan of Conversion, Anthem indicates that
``Eligible Statutory Members'' will be those persons (or entities)
who were Statutory Members on June 18, 2001 (the date Anthem's Board
of Directors adopted the Plan of Conversion), who continue to be
Statutory Members on the effective date of the conversion and who
have had continuous health care benefits coverage with the same
company (either Anthem or its Blue Cross and Blue Shield
subsidiaries in Kentucky, Ohio or Connecticut) during the period
between those two dates without a break in coverage of more than one
day. As used herein ``Eligible Statutory Members'' refer also to
``Eligible Members.''
In addition, Anthem's Plan of Conversion states that a Statutory
Member is, as of any specified date, any person, who in accordance
with the records, Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws of Anthem, is
the holder of an ``in force'' policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, Anthem explains that Indian Demutualization Law
requires that the question of who qualifies as a Statutory Member be
determined by reference to the mutual company's articles of
incorporation, by-laws and records. Anthem points out that its
membership rules are found primarily in its By-Laws. With respect to
group health benefits contracts, Anthem notes that its By-Laws provide
that Statutory Members are those persons who have been granted
membership rights under insurance agreements between Anthem and the
employer (or other person, including an employer association or
employee organization) acting for and on the persons' behalf. Anthem
further explains that is By-Laws have provided for deceased that a
certificate holder with health benefits coverage from the insurer is
granted membership rights rather than the holder of the group contract,
regardless of who pays the premiums for health benefits coverage.
With respect to the commenter, Anthem confirms that the Plan
received its group health benefits contract from an Anthem affiliate
and that the Plan Participants were issue certificates of membership
from Anthem. In addition, Anthem indicates that the Plan was issued a
``guaranty policy'' under which it would not be considered a Statutory
Member. Instead, the certificate holders (i.e., the Plan Participants
who elected the Plan's insured option) were granted membership rights.
As Statutory Members, Anthem asserts that the Plan Participants were
given the right to vote in the election of Anthem's Board of Directors
and to vote on any proposition that the Board submits to a vote of the
Statutory Members in accordance with Indiana law. Furthermore, Anthem
explains that Indiana law requires that these Plan Participants (as
Statutory Members) also have the right to receive consideration in the
event of Anthem's demutualization.
The Department has considered the comment and has determined not to
adopt the commenter's recommendation that the exemption be revised to
require that Anthem distribute the demutualization consideration to the
Plan. In this regard, the Department notes that Indiana Demutualization
Law mandates that Anthem's Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws govern
who is accorded membership interests in the company and to whom the
demutualization consideration is to be paid. The Department also notes
that Anthem's By-Laws predate the Plan's contractual arrangement with
the company. Lastly, the Trustees, as fiduciaries of the Plan,
determined to enter into, and be subject to the terms of, a group
health benefits contract with an Anthem affiliate which conferred
certain ownership and voting rights on Plan Participants that are
Eligible Members of Anthem. Although the demutualization may not have
been contemplated at contract execution by the Trustees, nevertheless,
one of these ownership rights is the right to receive consideration in
the event of Anthem's demutualization.
Anthem's Comment
1. Operative Language Changes and Effective Date. In Section I of
the proposed exemption, in the operative language, the first sentence
of the initial paragraph states, in part, that if the exemption is
granted the restrictions and sanctions imposed under the Act and the
Code will not apply to the receipt of certain demutalization
consideration, by a Plan, or a Plan Participant, both of which are
Eligible Members by reason of their ownership of an insurance policy or
contract issued by Anthem. Anthem requests that this sentence be
revised to delete the definition of ``Eligible Member'' because it
believes the definition conflicts with the correct definition of
Eligible Member, as set forth in Section III of the proposal.
In addition, Anthem requests that the final exemption be made
effective as of October 24, 2001, and that this effective date be
referenced in the grant notice. On October 29, 2001, Anthem represents
that it anticipates entering into binding agreements to sell the Common
Stock to underwriters on November 2, 2001. Because the granting of the
exemption is a condition to the closing of the sale, Anthem states that
it will not be able to deliver the Common Stock on November 2, 2001,
pursuant to the agreements unless the exemption is signed and
effective.
Therefore, Anthem suggests that the initial paragraph of the
operative
[[Page 56136]]
language be revised to read as follows in the final exemption:
The restrictions of section 406(a) of the Act and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by
reason of section 4975(a)(1)(A) through (D) of the Code, shall not
apply, effective October 24, 2001, to the receipt, by an employee
benefit plan (the Plan) or by a Plan participant (the Plan
Participant) that is an eligible member (the Eligible Member), by
reason of the ownership of an insurance policy or contract * * *
In addition, Anthem requests that the final exemption reflect an
effective date.
In response to these comments, the Department has made the
requested changes to the operative language and has also added a new
section to the final exemption captioned ``Effective Date.''
2. Allocation of Common Stock to Eligible Members. Section II(f) of
the proposed exemption provides, in relevant part, that after each
Eligible Member entitled to receive shares of Common Stock is allocated
at least 21 shares, additional consideration will be allocated to
Eligible Members who own participating policies based on actuarial
formulas that take into account each participating policy's
contribution to Anthem's statutory surplus and are subject to review
and approval by the Commissioner. Anthem requests that Section II(f) be
revised as follows to reflect more accurately how additional
consideration will be allocated to Eligible Members:
After each Eligible Member entitled to receive shares of Common
Stock is allocated at least 21 shares, additional consideration may
be allocated to Eligible Members based on actuarial formulas that
take into account each Eligible Member's contribution to Anthem's
statutory surplus, which formulas are subject to review and approval
by the Commissioner.
Anthem represents that its policies are generally issued and
renewed for a term of one year. In order to compensate Eligible Members
fairly for their membership interests, Anthem explains that the
actuarial formulas used to allocate consideration take into account an
Eligible Member's total contribution to the insurer's statutory surplus
based on all of the policies and certificates under which the Eligible
Member has had continuous coverage, rather than the actuarial
contribution of a single policy or certificate held on the date used to
calculate each Eligible Member's contribution to surplus. In addition,
Anthem states that it decided to delete references to ``participating''
policies because it does not have any policies that require the payment
of dividends or as to which any person has any reasonable expectation
for the payment of dividends.
In response to this comment, the Department has revised Section
II(f) of the final exemption, accordingly.
3. Definition of Anthem. Section III(a) of the proposed exemption
defines the term ``Anthem'' to include any affiliate of Anthem, as
defined in paragraph (b) of Section III. Anthem requests that the
reference to the phrase ``any affiliate of Anthem, as defined in
paragraph (b) of this Section III'' be deleted from the definition
because Anthem and its affiliates are defined separately in the
exemption application and many of the provisions from the exemption
application have been incorporated into the proposal. Anthem notes that
by treating it and its affiliates as the same entity changes the
meaning of many of those provisions, as defined in the proposal. In
this regard, Anthem points out that the clearest example of this is in
the definition of ``Eligible Member'' in Section III(e). Without
distinguishing between it and its affiliates, Anthem notes that the
definition would incorrectly denote persons with policies issued by
affiliates of Anthem as members of Anthem. Anthem further points out
that policyholders of its affiliates are not Anthem members and, thus,
will not have voting rights or receive compensation.
4. Notice to Interested Persons. In the Section of the proposal
captioned ``Notice to Interested Persons,'' the first sentence of the
third paragraph states, at 40748, that Anthem will provide a copy of
the proposed exemption to interested persons within 15 days of the
publication of the proposal in the Federal Register. Anthem states that
this paragraph should be revised to reflect that the comment period for
the proposed exemption was extended because ``The Member Information
Statement'' (the MIS), which contained the ``Notice of Application for
Prohibited Transaction'' (the Notice) was mailed over a period of
several days, rather than on a single date. Anthem states that it began
mailing the MIS on August 17, which was within 15 days of the date that
the proposed exemption was published in the Federal Register. However,
Anthem explains that it recognized that the mailing would take several
days to complete, so the comment period was extended from September 17,
2001, to October 1, 2001, to allow members enough time from the date of
the final mailing to file comments with the Department. Anthem further
explains that its Notice informed members of the extended comment
period.
In response, the Department notes this revision to the proposal.
5. Transaction Change. Finally, Anthem states that it wishes to
update the Department concerning a change in the demutualization
process. In this regard, Anthem notes that the six month lock-up period
(referred to in Representation 12) during which all Eligible Members
are prohibited from selling their shares of Common Stock has been
eliminated for many Eligible Members. Anthem explains that Eligible
Members will generally be free to sell their shares of Common Stock in
the open market after they receive their notification of share
ownership. However, Anthem indicates that a small number of Eligible
Members (i.e., certain large group customers) who receive and continue
to hold 30,000 or more shares of Common Stock in exchange for their
membership interests will still be restricted from selling,
transferring, pledging, hypothecating or otherwise assigning their
shares for 180 days following the effective date of the Plan of
Conversion, except where the transfer (a) Is in accordance with a Large
Holder Sale program.\2\ (b) occurs by operation of law,\3\ or (c)
occurs with the written consent of Anthem. After the expiration of the
180 day period, Anthem states that the large group Eligible Members
will be free to sell their Common Stock in the open market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Large Holder Sale Program is designed to help ensure
that the public trading market for the Common Stock is not adversely
affected by the sale of large blocks before the trading market has
time to achieve mature trading characteristics. The program applies
only during the first 180 days following the effective date of the
Plan of Conversion, and it applies only to ``Large Holders,'' a
relatively small number of large group customers who will receive
30,000 or more shares of Common Stock in the demutualization. If
Large Holders want to sell their shares of Common Stock during that
180 day period, they have to follow special procedures designed to
limit the total number of shares sold by Large holder in the open
market on any one trading day during that period. The Large Sale
Holder Program cannot be changed without the consent of the
Commissioner.
\3\ A ``transfer by operation of law'' refers to a transfer of
stock that occurs, not because of a voluntary sale or contractual
assignment of the stock, but as the legal consequence of some other
event. For example, if one corporation merges into another
corporation in a statutory merger transaction, the assets of the
merging corporation are deemed by the state corporate law merger
statute to be transferred to the surviving corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, after giving full consideration to the entire record,
including the written comments, the Department has decided to grant the
exemption subject to the modifications and clarifications described
above.
For further information regarding the comments and other matters
discussed herein, interested persons are
[[Page 56137]]
encouraged to obtain copies of the exemption application file
(Exemption Application No. D-10979) the Department is maintaining in
this case. The complete application file, as well as all supplemental
submissions received by the Department, are made available for public
inspection in the Public Disclosure Room of the Pension and Welfare
Benefits Administration, Room N-1513, U.S. Department Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jan D. Broady of the Department,
telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified
person from certain other provisions to which the exemptions does not
apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section
404 of the Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to
discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the
participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in
accordance with section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the
requirement of Section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate
for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) These exemptions are supplemental to and not in derogation of,
any other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, including statutory or
administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the
fact that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory
exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of these exemptions is subject to the express
condition that the material facts and representations contained in each
application accurately describes all material terms of the transaction
which is the subject of the exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of October, 2001.
Ivan Strasfield,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 01-27753 Filed 11-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
|
|